ESPN vs UFC: who earns more on YouTube?

ESPN earns an estimated $122K–$428K a month from YouTube ads, about 1.1× UFC's estimated $115K–$402K.

MetricESPNUFC
Est. monthly revenue$122K–$428K$115K–$402K
Est. yearly revenue$1.5M–$5.1M$1.4M–$4.8M
Per long-form video$296–$1,030$856–$3,000
Subscribers14.6M23.2M
Est. monthly views117.3M217.8M
Shorts share of views49%75%
Videos116,16526,864
CategoryFitness and healthFitness and health
RPM (per 1,000 views)$2–$7$2–$7

Where does the gap come from?

  • UFC gets more views (217.8M vs 117.3M for ESPN) yet earns less: where the views come from and what kind they are matters.
  • 75% of UFC's views come from Shorts (ESPN: 49%). Shorts pay far less per 1,000 views than long-form videos.

Sponsorships, memberships, Super Thanks, merchandise and other income are not included. The real total is often higher than ad revenue alone.

Calculate your own channel

Enter your channel name or set views and category yourself.

Open the YouTube calculator →

Frequently asked questions

Who earns more, ESPN or UFC?

ESPN earns an estimated $122K–$428K a month from YouTube ads, about 1.1× UFC's estimated $115K–$402K.

How many subscribers do ESPN and UFC have?

ESPN has about 14.6M subscribers and UFC about 23.2M. Revenue depends on views, not subscribers.

Figures are estimates based on public YouTube data; actual revenue may differ. Methodology →